# EXODUS - EXchange Of Digital Uniformed Signatures ## Overview This module optimizes a hot spot in the verification formula used for missing‑signer recovery. The target expression is: `k*P + l*Q + d*M` which requires three scalar multiplications and two point additions. Naive elliptic‑curve routines make this very gas‑expensive; this work reduces cost while maintaining correctness. For full background and protocol details see the [project wiki](https://git.ghostchain.io/ghostchain/ghost-exodus-draft/wiki/Description). ## Goals * Reduce gas for the targeted combination of scalar multiplications and additions. * Keep implementation compact and auditable for on‑chain use. * Maintain correctness and safety for cryptographic operations. ## Design choices * Use Projective coordinates (not Jacobian) to cut down on the number of `mulmod`/`addmod` operations where possible while retaining simple formulas for point addition and doubling. * Perform the final conversion to affine coordinates with an optimized `Extended Euclidean Algorithm` implemented in inline assembly to reduce gas compared with high‑level inversion routines. * Benchmark against the Jacobian implementation from the [witnet elliptic‑curve‑solidity project](https://github.com/witnet/elliptic-curve-solidity) as a reference. ## Rationale * Projective coordinates: fewer modular multiplications in the common path, making point operations cheaper on average. * Assembly `Extended Euclidean Algorithm` for inversion: this algorithm in optimized inline assembly typically yields lower gas for single inversions compared with repeated `mulmod` exponentiation or other higher‑level approaches. * Comparing to a well‑maintained Jacobian implementation gives a meaningful baseline for gas and correctness. ## Gas Usage `Jacobian` is the original implementation used as a reference implementation, while `Projective` is optimized one. ``` ╭----------------------------------------+-----------------+-------+--------+-------+---------╮ | src/MathTester.sol:MathTester Contract | | | | | | +=============================================================================================+ | Deployment Cost | Deployment Size | | | | | |----------------------------------------+-----------------+-------+--------+-------+---------| | 1065323 | 4715 | | | | | |----------------------------------------+-----------------+-------+--------+-------+---------| | | | | | | | |----------------------------------------+-----------------+-------+--------+-------+---------| | Function Name | Min | Avg | Median | Max | # Calls | |----------------------------------------+-----------------+-------+--------+-------+---------| | addJacobian | 1768 | 1768 | 1768 | 1768 | 44 | |----------------------------------------+-----------------+-------+--------+-------+---------| | addProjective | 992 | 992 | 992 | 992 | 44 | |----------------------------------------+-----------------+-------+--------+-------+---------| | doubleJacobian | 777 | 777 | 777 | 777 | 45 | |----------------------------------------+-----------------+-------+--------+-------+---------| | doubleProjective | 532 | 532 | 532 | 532 | 45 | |----------------------------------------+-----------------+-------+--------+-------+---------| | toAffineJacobian | 30564 | 36206 | 36300 | 40841 | 89 | |----------------------------------------+-----------------+-------+--------+-------+---------| | toAffineProjective | 11838 | 13792 | 13796 | 15155 | 89 | ╰----------------------------------------+-----------------+-------+--------+-------+---------╯ ``` ## Contributing All contributions are welcome — whether it's code, documentation, tests, performance benchmarks, or review. Please submit commits, issues, or pull requests; any help to improve correctness, security, or gas efficiency is greatly appreciated.