From 1ce4a237df400f9d368318501aeb3adc419385dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Uncle Stretch Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 19:25:43 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Update Description --- Description.md | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Description.md b/Description.md index d370660..bba0e29 100644 --- a/Description.md +++ b/Description.md @@ -56,7 +56,23 @@ $$ s*G - e*H_{\text{agg}}= R - \sum_i^m (e*(a_i * X_i) + b*R_{\text{i1}} + d*R_{ ## Reporting issues and feedback -If you find any issue with code and/or the formula, please report it via one of the links below or open an issue on the website if you have an account. Contributions, extensions, and questions are welcome. +We welcome feedback and bug reports from knowledgeable contributors. If you discover any issues or have suggestions, please contact us via email or any of the social links below. If you have an account here, you may also submit a free-form issue. + +We are currently investigating the following questions: + +1. Is it feasible to construct arguments in polynomial time that cause the verifier’s equation to hold? + +$$ R', s', message', a_{\text{il}}', a_{\text{ir}}', X_i', R_{\text{i1}}', R_{\text{i2}}'$$ + +$$ s'*G + \sum_i^m (e*(a_i' * X_i') + b*R_{\text{i1}}' + d*R_{\text{i2}})' = R' + e*H_{\text{agg}} $$ + +2. Can information about missing signers be consolidated into a single entry? + +$$ \sum_i^m (e*(a_i * X_i) + b*R_{\text{i1}} + d*R_{\text{i2}}) = e*(a' * X') + b*R_{\text{1}}' + d*R_{\text{2}}' $$ + +3. Are parameters $b$ and $d$ sufficiently robust and indistinguishable from each other? + +4. Are there any other issues you can identify? Email: support@ghostchain.io